2. The judgment of the court below is recognized that all of the crimes of this case are recognized by the defendant, and the defendant supports her six-year married, and the amount of damage caused by the fraud of this case is not significant. The defendant again commits the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime after the execution of imprisonment with prison labor was completed, and even during the trial of this case, it is not good that the crime of this case is committed again during the period of repeated crime, and it is not good that the defendant commits the crime of fraud of this case. The defendant committed the fraud of similar laws repeatedly over a short period, the victim R et al. want to be punished against the defendant; the crime of multiple frauds occurred based on the defendant's illegal transfer of passbook, etc.; the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means, means, and result; and the situation before and after the crime, etc., the sentencing of the court below is judged to be appropriate, and it is not too unreasonable to deem it too inappropriate.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, the court below's "application of Acts and subordinate statutes" 1. Formal concurrence: It is obvious that the omission was made between the crimes of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act committed at the same place on the same date as Article 40 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, and therefore, it is corrected ex officio by correcting that the addition was made pursuant

.