However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 10, 2018, at around 19:40 on May 10, 2018, the Defendant provided a bath to the victim D (year 44) who is a police assigned for special guard belonging to the Ulsan Metropolitan City Facility Management Corporation of Ulsan Metropolitan City, who was called up after receiving a report to the effect that “the drunk person takes a bath, and so on” was unable to take care of the victim’s face and body in drinking.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties regarding the prevention and suppression of the above D crimes, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as an open wound, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (the crimes of obstruction of the performance of official duties and the crimes of bodily injury, and punishment imposed on the crimes of serious bodily injury);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (hereinafter “the grounds for the remaining sentence”), which is favorable to the defendant;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Order to Provide community service and attend lecture is committed by the victim, a police officer assigned for special guard, who was dispatched after receiving a report of the disturbance under the influence of alcohol in the C playground, and the defendant took the face and body of the victim, and obstructed legitimate execution of duties by taking the victim's face and body. In light of the Criminal Code, the crime's nature and nature are not good, in light of the circumstances at the time of the crime, etc., the degree of interference with this case's assault and official duties is not weak, and the liability for the crime is not weak, and the victim, a police officer assigned for special guard, who did not suffer injury until now, and the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim or did not receive a letter from the victim, etc. is recognized and contradictory to the defendant's entire criminal act.