2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. 업무 방해 피고인은 2017. 3. 7. 15:30 경부터 같은 날 16:30 경까지 부산 남구 B에 있는 피해자 C이 관리하는 'D' 식당 내에서, 술에 취하여 기분이 나쁘다는 이유로 위 식당 종업원과 손님들이 있는 가운데 “이 씹년 아, 개쌔끼야, 니 와 봐라 ”라고 큰소리로 욕설을 하고 가래침을 바닥에 수회 뱉는 등 소란을 피워 그 식당에 있는 손님들 로 하여금 불안감을 느끼게 하고 다른 손님들이 들어오지 못하게 함으로써 위력으로 피해자의 식당 영업 업무를 방해하였다.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article, openly insulting the victims, including repeatedly seeing 10 people, who were the police official belonging to the Busan Southern Police Station E District Police Station, and who were taking meals in the above restaurant in order to get out of G, and 10 guests who were in the above restaurant.

3. On March 7, 2017, the Defendant was arrested as a current offender on the grounds of paragraphs (1) and (2) around 16:50 on March 7, 2017, and went to the Edistrict parking lot located in Busan Southern-gu, and the Defendant assaulted the Defendant, a police officer, who was a police officer, who was working in the said patrol group, on the ground that the Defendant was unfolded to go to the said patrol group, on the ground that he would go to the said patrol group, twice the lower part of the I’s left part and walked one time, on the ground that he would go to the said patrol group.

Accordingly, the defendant, who is a police officer, interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the above I Flagrant offender arrest and criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement made to C, F, and I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes in F and G of each complaint filed by the complaint;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts.