Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On May 28, 2015, in the process of ordering coffees at the C coffee shop located in the middle-dong subway 7, Jung-gu, Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, around 12:55, the Defendant made a public warning to the victim that “spath of spaths” was “the spaths” to the victim in the presence of two employees of the said coffee shop.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each part of the statements of D and E in the witness examination protocol of this Court for D and E

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act alleged to the effect that the Defendant’s above act by the Defendant’s aforementioned act is excluded from illegality by an act that does not contravene social rules. However, in light of the motive and circumstance of the instant case, the details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc. acknowledged by the evidence revealed above, the above act cannot be deemed as an act that does not violate social rules.

Therefore, the defendant and his defense counsel cannot be accepted.