A. Since misunderstanding of facts D and E had a dubial and duble of the Defendant on the day of the instant case, the Defendant complained against the truth.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing (three million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the following circumstances that can be recognized by mistake of facts: ① D and E are consistently phone calls from the investigation agency to the court below's trial; ② although her mother and the taxi engineer were in the present site of this case, her mother stated that the Defendant did not satise and satisf at the time, her mother did not satisfy; ② the Party who continued witnessing the present site of this case from the investigation agency to the court of the court below her consistent with D and E did not look at and satisfy; ③ the Defendant was under investigation by the police on October 7, 2012, under investigation of assault against C; ③ The Defendant did not make a statement to the effect that she was subject to assault, such as her own DoD and e, satfy, and was under investigation by the police; ② the Defendant received 300,000 won of the Defendant's physical order from 30,000 won on the day of receiving the Defendant's damages damages from 2.

B. The instant crime of unfair sentencing requires a strict punishment for the Defendant’s filing of a false accusation against D and E, thereby infringing on the national legal interest, which is an appropriate exercise of the State’s trial function, and seriously threatening the legal stability in order to avoid such an act.