However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 10, 2013, at around 23:10, the Defendant driven a 20k section of approximately 20km from the street in front of the U.S. Den. Den. Den. Den. Den. Den. Den. Em., the Defendant driven a bschton car in his possession under the influence of alcohol content of 0.216%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on the statement of the status of a drinking driver;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: The defendant again commits the instant crime even though he/she had a previous record of the same kind of crime, the risk of drunk driving, and the purpose of the revision of the Road Traffic Act to strengthen the punishment for drunk driving: The defendant reflects his/her crime, and taking into account various circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, occupation, home environment, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in