However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. No person who violates the Framework Act on Fire Services shall interfere with the extinguishing of a fire, saving of lives, or first-aid services by using violence or intimidation against fire officers dispatched without justifiable grounds;

On August 5, 2017, around 19:50, the Defendant asserted D and Si expenses, which are folded at “C” restaurants located in “C”, and received 112 report that there was an assault case, and appealed to the police officers dispatched to the above site, and sent them to the above site at the F (30 years of age) that caused the fire brigade belonging to E (30 years of age) upon the request of the police officers for rescue.

On the same day, the fire brigade F escorted the Defendant to the front of the H hospital emergency room located in G at 20:16, while the Defendant sent the Defendant I 119 emergency vehicle in front of the above emergency room. However, the Defendant expressed that “F, within the above emergency vehicle in a state of stopping in front of the emergency room, solicits F to leave the hospital for the treatment of the hospital, “F, e.g., f. in the body of f. in his hand,” and said F twice the front side of the F to the left hand of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the first aid activities by assaulting the fire fighter dispatched.

2. The Defendant: (a) was able to board and move to the front seat of the K Patrol Police Station in the operation of police officers, who refused medical examination and treatment at the above H Hospital and returned home to the hospital; and (b) had been called out at the above location; (c) the Defendant was on the front seat of the K Patrol Police Station.

The defendant 20:34 of the above day was in front of the "M Ski" L, which is located in the above 20:34, and without any justifiable reason, damaged the patrol car, which is a public object building used by public offices, by breaking the front and rear glass of the patrol car, several times without any reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Relevant photographs;

1. Investigation reports (on-site mobilization status, etc.);

1. To be called out, called out, and called out for emergency and medical services activities;

1. Investigation report (to pay the suspect expenses incurred in repairing the K Patrols);

1. The investigation report (as for the first-aid vehicle and patrol vehicle image) and photographic Acts and subordinate statutes, flavating images.