1. In light of the fact that around April 2012, the Defendant, a mother of the Defendant, formed a false lease agreement as if he/she had concluded a lease agreement with respect to 201 and 302 of the Il-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu

Accordingly, from April 201 to May 2012, the Defendant arbitrarily cut the C’s license and stolen the C’s driver’s license, and then cut off the stamp, identification card, and other documents, etc., to E. Around that time, the Defendant: (a) made a lease contract on April 16, 2012 with respect to the said apartment by using the computer from the site of the location of the location to the lessor for the term “C, E, lessee, deposit 180 million won, and the term of lease 24 months”; (b) written the lease contract on April 16, 2012 with respect to the said apartment on the lessor’s address to the Seoul Mapo-gu F, resident registration number column, “G” and the name column; and (c) affixed a seal affixed to C in the name of the Defendant, which was possessed by the Defendant.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged one copy of the lease contract in the name of C, which is a private document on rights and duties, for the purpose of exercising the rights and duties in collusion with E and a person in bad name

2. At around that time, the Defendant, when applying for a loan to E, a person in unsound name and the victim company, was gathered in order to exercise a forged lease agreement as seen above as the collateral for the borrowed loan. Accordingly, on May 2012, E applied for a loan at a place not suitable for patrolman, and as such, E applied for a loan at the name-free shop, and as if the document was duly formed with the employee of the victim company who knew of the forgery, the Defendant was the victim company.