However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 30, 2015, the Defendant was a person who operated a travel business under the trade name of "C" in 203 B building B in Gyeongnam Development Group, and the Defendant made a false statement to the employees in charge of general affairs of the victim E livestock industry cooperative in D at the time of residence on July 30, 2015, that "at least 3.8,000 won per 1,000 won per travel for 12 employees of the victim union, who are in charge of general affairs of the victim E livestock industry cooperative, shall be changed to 3.8,000 won per travel for 10,000 won per 8,000 won per travel."

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to allow the above group travel even if he receives the travel expenses from the victim association.

As above, the Defendant deceivings employees in charge of the Victim’s Union and transferred KRW 10 million to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the Defendant for travel expenses on July 30, 2015, and KRW 36.2 million to the same account under the same name on August 4, 2015, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Contracts for overseas travel;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to verify transaction details;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of the recommended punishment] general fraud [the case where a person who has been specially mitigated commits an intentional deception] (one month to one year) in the mitigation area (the special mitigated person], or the case where the degree of the deceptive act is weak (the decision of the sentence], and there is no criminal conviction for the defendant, and the victim is the defendant's preference at the victim's side, and the sentence is imposed as ordered, taking into account the defendant's age, sexual behavior and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., as set forth in the argument of this case.