2. The judgment of this case is a case in which the defendant defrauded the victim B with 8,211,940 won under the name of Handphone, etc., but the defendant divided his mistake, but the defendant did not repay the damage, the court below has already reduced the amount of fine of 5 million won under the summary order by 4 million won, the defendant had been punished for the same kind of crime including 4 times before and after the sentence, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime do not seem to be so unreasonable in light of all the sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit.