However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

1. The Defendant interfering with his duties on August 9, 2016, on the ground that “D dan bar” operated by the victim C (V, 51 years of age) in the Gosung-gun, Gosung-gun, the Defendant is equal to the year of the conclusion of the judgment and the year of the judgment on August 9, 2016, on the ground that he gets on and off the cab in which the victim gets on and off the cab.”

Nice Dol Dol Dol Dol Dol Dol Dol.

“Until 21:35 on the same day, it interfered with the victim’s main business by force for about 10 minutes from the same day, such as taking a bath, cutting a beer’s disease on the floor, etc.

2. On August 9, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, at around 21:50, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 that she was under influence of alcohol and was assaulted at “D dan”; and (b) was sent to the site by the guard F of the Gosung Police Station E box, who was called to the site, to arrest the Defendant as a current offender, such as interfering with the duties of the Defendant; and (c) was the F of the above circumstances.

Whether only a woman's words are believed or believed

C. The Defendant’s f’s body was f’s body at the Defendant’s hand when f’s f’s f’s body was expressed.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of police officers to the field, public safety and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement prepared by the police for F and C;

1. A report on investigation (a suspect's daily investigation, witness's investigation);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. According to Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence, the sentence shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the following conditions of sentencing, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, background, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.

There shall be no history of punishment exceeding a fine.