When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 11, 2015, the Defendant requested that the victim be forced to take knee and knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee kne kne kne kne kn kn kn kn kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Recording of each statement of witness D and F in the third public trial records;

1. A written statement in F and D;

1. Application of the CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted as to the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order Act. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that police officers, such as the victim, etc. dispatched at the time of the case, trying to pluck up or pluck up the defendant's arms without asking the defendant for his self-refence, and they merely resisted the defendant, and they did not wish to do so, and they did not want to do so.

According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, ① the Defendant was on the job at a G restaurant with which he had been employed by the captain at the time of the instant case (a police officer in charge of an injured person was on the job at a G restaurant that had been employed by him prior to the instant case and called up with a person who was on the job at the G restaurant that had been employed by the captain at the time of the instant case.

on-site termination;

The E convenience store in the vicinity of the restaurant and the employee requested the employee to report on behalf of the defendant to 112. Upon receipt of the above report, the police officer such as the victim was dispatched to the site of this case.