2. The judgment of the court below is contrary to the defendant. The crime of interference with business, etc. for which the judgment of the court below became final and conclusive and each of the crimes of this case are concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and the equality in the case of concurrent crimes under Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act shall be taken into account. However, the defendant has criminal records, which were sentenced to a fine with the previous 201 criminal records in 201, the victim was not agreed upon, and the court below appears to have determined punishment by fully taking into account the above circumstances. The court below's sentence is deemed to have been determined by considering various circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.