When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 19, 2019, the Defendant: (a) 03:31 on December 19, 2019, was drunk in the Gyeonggi-gu Gyeonggi Police Station C District District of the Gyeonggi-do Police Station B located in Suwon-si, and (b) Sheeted, “B is arrested as a public official; (c) Hadin as a police officer belonging to the said C District; (d) Hadin Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had

At around 03:37 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) committed assault to the police officer D, who took a bath to “Cracker A,” and “Fracker B,” the son and son, who took the bath to “Cracker A,” and “fricker,” on the face of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to 112 Report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. The proviso to Article 35 and the proviso to Article 42 of the Criminal Act among repeated offenders;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order shows an attitude that the defendant recognized the crime and seriously reflects the defendant's attitude, the degree of assault by the defendant is not serious, the defendant has no record of criminal punishment due to the obstruction of performance of official duties, and other conditions of sentencing as indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, character and conduct, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., shall be determined