A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and by a fine of one million won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Defendant

A leased Nos. 512, 515, 517, and 524, Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government’s Dtel and advertised the above establishment on the Internet “F,” and employed G, H, I, etc. as female employees.

Defendant

B resided in the above officetel 811, and upon the request of the defendant A, he was in charge of guiding the office room in which female employees receive commercial sex acts from customers or receive commercial sex acts from customers.

The Defendants conspired to act as a business of arranging sexual traffic from Jun. 2, 2014 to Jul. 16, 2014, such as inducing female employees, such as G, etc. to engage in the act of similar intercourse that helps customers see their sexual organ by hand and standing, etc., in collusion with the above officetels, the Defendants received 35,000 won from customers without his/her name, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer concerning G, H and I;

1. Written statements of J, K and L;

1. Application of each photograph, lease contract;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Defendant B who has chosen to imprisonment with prison labor: Selection of fine;

1. Defendant B of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A with suspended sentence: Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommending punishment: Defendant A] and the basic area (6-1-4 months and month) of the two types, such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic (such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic by giving and receiving business fees, etc.) [the sentence] Defendant A continues to engage in business even though it has been controlled once, it is difficult to readily punish Defendant A in light of the scale of the crime, profits from the crime, etc.

However, the defendant A has no criminal record of the same kind and reflects the mistake, and the defendant B has several times upon the request of the defendant A.