However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 26, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 500,000 to the Cheongju District Court for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and a summary order of KRW 700,000 to the same crime in the Daejeon District Court on January 16, 2009, respectively.

Nevertheless, around 01:16 on January 3, 2019, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with 0.136% of blood alcohol concentration, and was driving a B-type taxi at the 1km section from the 1km to the roads in front of the National Highway Sincheon-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, through which it is impossible to identify the trade name in the Yancheon-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do to the 21km road in the same Eup/Myeon.

Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, was driving a motor vehicle again under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the results of the drinking driving control, report on the situation of a drinking driver, and inquiry into the results of the drinking driving control;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports and investigation reports (Attachment to summary orders of the same kind of case) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of imprisonment (Consideration of intention of the accused, economic situation, etc.);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act suspended execution (see, e.g., Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do1448, Apr. 1, 201; 201Do1448, Apr. 2, 2011)