However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 11, 2018, while the defendant set a claim against C on the ground that he/she was not able to repay the money that he/she lent to C at the office located in Asan-si B, he/she left the victim D (W, 69 years of age) who avoided the defendant by selling it, and caused the victim to face the left part of the metal table.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as the thring of 12 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each legal statement of D and E;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel argued that the victim himself was in the process of putting the clothes of the defendant, and that the victim did not inflict any injury on the victim. However, the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence of the judgment are as follows: ① the defendant: (a) in the police station, the defendant: (b) affixed a photo on the scene of the defendant's body in which the victim was boomed by C using a mobile phone whose he was weak to C; and (c) caused the defendant to be placed in the victim; and (d) in the process, the victim got out of the floor; and (c) made a statement to the effect that the victim was in fighting between the defendant and the victim; (b) the victim made a statement from the investigative agency to this court to the effect that "the victim was in fighting between the defendant and the victim; (b) the victim was tight or merely boomed by the victim; and (d) the victim was tightly boomed by the victim; and (c) the victim was able to take out the witness at the investigative agency and the victim."