성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is so unreasonable that it is too unreasonable that the court below sentenced the Defendants (in case of Defendant A: one year of imprisonment, one year of deprivation of evidence 1, two years and six months of imprisonment, two years and six months of imprisonment, two years of imprisonment, two years of imprisonment, and one year and six months of imprisonment).
2. The fact that Defendant B made a confession of his criminal act before this court, and the rest of the Defendants made a detailed statement about the role of himself and other co-defendants in the crime of this case and recognized his mistake is favorable to the Defendants.
In addition, the fact that the defendant C is suffering from urology, that the defendant A is an initial offender, and that the defendant D is only one time prior to a fine for urology, which is favorable to each individual.
However, it is not recognized that the court below’s punishment is unfair because it is too unreasonable, considering the following factors: the Defendants’ act of arranging commercial sex acts committed by the Defendants was committed continuously despite the commission of commercial sex acts around July 29, 2016; the Defendants continued to engage in commercial sex acts despite the commission of commercial sex acts around July 29, 2016; the Defendants’ age, sex behavior, environment, circumstances leading up to crimes, and circumstances after crimes, etc., were comprehensively considered.
3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.