대여금반환
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The plaintiff asserts that he lent KRW 100 million to the defendant on October 26, 2009, and sought the return of the principal, interest, and delay damages.
However, even based on the statement No. 1-2 and No. 1-2 of the evidence, it is not sufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff transferred KRW 100 million to the Defendant on behalf of the Vienna Construction Co., Ltd., and further, it is not sufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff, as alleged by the Plaintiff, is the subject of the above money lending to the Defendant, or that the said money transfer constitutes the lending.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.