However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On January 201, 201, the criminal defendant against the victim B made a false statement to the victim B, at the office of the Co., Ltd., a director of the company with which he/she was employed, that “I would undertake construction work of the above factory if I would like to lend necessary expenses to the modern middle industry cooperation company after newly constructing the ground in the non-speakdo with the knowledge of modern middle industry directors.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not plan to construct the above factory, and it was not possible for the victim to work the above factory, and the Defendant did not receive approximately 6 months’ worth of 15 million won since the default on October 2010, and did not have any special property. Therefore, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim under the name of the borrowed money, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

As above, the Defendant, as well as receiving KRW 2 million in cash from the injured party under the pretext of factory construction on January 23, 2011, by deceiving the injured party as above, and received KRW 36,756,000 in total from around that time to August 7, 2013 as the name of borrowed money, such as the statement in the list of crimes committed in attached Form 10 times.

2. On July 201, the Defendant, in relation to the victim D, was aware of the victim D’s inside the sports complex located in Namyang-do, Gyeonggi-do, that the victim D was well aware of the victim D’s relationship with the former North Scart, and the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E (the victim’s children) by entering the former North Korea’s world. In response to the request by the Scart-related party, entertainment expenses and case expenses were required, and thus, the costs were changed.

However, the defendant did not know about the person who had been in the relationship with the former North Korea, and even if he received money from the injured party for the purpose of entertainment expenses and case expenses, he did not have the intent or ability to win the injured party's children into the North Korean War before the professional axis.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and deceivings the victim as entertainment expenses and case expenses. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 23290, Jan. 201>