When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 4, 2014, around 08:25, at the C business office located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim to remove the victim’s door-to-door dispatch of the vehicle directly loaded the vehicle; (b) the victim requested the victim to leave the vehicle on the vehicle; and (c) the victim took a bath to see her “Is frid frid frid frid frid frid frid frid frid frid frid frid frid frid frith; and (d) the victim frid frid frid frid frid frid frid frid frid frid

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Permissible sentencing factors: The fact that the accused has given the victim KRW 700,000 and agreed thereon;

2. Factors of negative sentencing: The fact that the accused has a past record of criminal punishment of about 30 times including imprisonment for the same kind of crime.

3. In full view of the above factors of sentencing, the amount of fine for summary order is appropriate since the defendant has already been placed in preference in consideration of the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim.