However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2015. 2. 25. 19:01경부터 같은 날 19:25경까지 사이에 부천시 오정구 고강동에 있는 고강파출소 내에서, 술에 취한 상태에서 운전하였다고 볼 만한 상당한 이유가 있어 경찰관으로부터 3회에 걸쳐 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구받았음에도 불구하고 음주측정기에 입김을 불어 넣는 시늉만 내는 방법으로 이를 회피하여 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정 요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger using a drinking measuring instrument and notification of the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act that selects the penalty;

2. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):

3. The decision of the same sentence as the order shall be made, in consideration of the fact that the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (refluence of the following favorable circumstances) reflects the error and that there is two times the previous convictions of the fine.