However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From November 2015, the Defendant was in a de facto marital relationship with the victim B (the age of 49) from November 2015.

On June 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 20:50 on June 24, 2016, on the ground that: (b) the victim was her child at the port of port in South-gu (the Defendant’s residence); (c) on the ground that the victim was her child at the scene, the victim’s face and head was her child at the front of the kitchen; (d) the victim was her baby at the front of the kitchen; and (e) the wind flag at the front of the scene being her child, who was her child, was her baby at the floor; and (e) the wind flag ( approximately about 40cm in length), which is a dangerous object that was separated from the department, brought the head part of the victim to the end of the victim; and (e) prevented the victim from being her child, such as the victim’s hand, etc., inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the victim’s hair in the number of days of treatment and the part of the victim’s finger.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph photographs of damaged parts, and photographs of crime tools;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking account of the defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc.

D. Unfavorable circumstances: The crime is not good that the injury was inflicted by dangerous goods to the living together with the victim, and the circumstances favorable to the fact that there was the same kind of punishment force in several times, including the sentence imposed: the victim agreed with the victim, and the victim wanted the defendant's wife in the intent to maintain a de facto marital relationship with the defendant.