beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.06.10 2014가합111021

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 330,00 and the Plaintiff’s 5% per annum from June 12, 2014 to June 10, 2015.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant were legally married couple who completed the marriage report on September 18, 1997, but the agreement was married on January 19, 2012.

나. 2011. 8.경 피고는 원고에게 2010. 11. 26.부터 2011. 7. 20.까지 C과 만난 일시, 장소, C으로부터 받은 선물내역 등을 밝히면서 ‘D아빠 정말 내가 해서는 안 될 행동을 한 것에 대해 깊이 죄송해요. 차라리 나보고 화를 내거나 했으면 좋겠는데 괴로워하는 당신을 보니 너무 맘이 아픕니다. 다시 한 번 용서를 빕니다.’는 내용의 진술서를 작성하여 주었다.

C. Around September 17, 2011, the Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Defendant and C, and C sent a majority of text messages to the effect that, if the Plaintiff did not withdraw the complaint on September 19, 201, the Plaintiff would return the Plaintiff’s workplace if the Plaintiff did not withdraw the complaint (hereinafter “C’s intimidation”), and on January 6, 2012, the Plaintiff received a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a result of a violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc.

(2011 High Court Decision 16682) d.

원고는 2013. 7. 2. C을 상대로 간통 등 불법행위로 인한 손해배상으로 5,000만 원을 구하는 소(이하 ‘이 사건 관련소송’이라고 한다)를 제기하였고, 이 사건 관련소송에서 C은 원고 주장에 대하여 다투면서 2014. 6. 11.경 ‘2011년 당시 남편이었던 원고에게 피고가 써준 진술서는 사실이 아니며 원고의 강압에 의해 작성된 것임을 밝힙니다.

As a result, I transfer my mind to friendly job offering C with a depth of damage that is not the subject of this.

“The content of the instant written self-written statement prepared by the Defendant (hereinafter “the instant written self-written statement”) was presented as evidence. E. In the instant lawsuit, the Plaintiff and C, by this Court Decision 2013Ddan304524, Sept. 17, 2014, “C” as the consolation money for emotional distress damages to the Plaintiff, KRW 20 million, and its delay damages.