2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Defendant was established based on Article 25-2 of the Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business Act and is a corporation that conducts business, such as quality inspections of petroleum and alternative fuel under Articles 25 and 31 of the same Act. The Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant on September 15, 1995 and served as the business management support team leader from January 201, and from January 201, as the business management support team leader from the Daegu North Korea Headquarters 201.

B. On January 14, 2014, the Defendant held a personnel committee and removed the Plaintiff on the grounds that the Plaintiff violated the rules of employment, such as the code of conduct for executives and employees and the rules of employment.

(2) Article 3 (Duties of Officers and Employees), Articles 7 (Exclusion of Preferential Benefits), 34 (Maintenance of Dignity), and Article 7 (Duty of Service) of the Rules of Employment of Officers and Employees are violated. Thus, the Plaintiff’s disciplinary action should be imposed in accordance with Article 38 (1) 1 through 5 of the Regulations on Personnel Management and Disciplinary Action) and Article 6 (Criteria for Disciplinary Action) of the Guidelines on Personnel Punishment.

On January 23, 2014, the Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed a request for reexamination to the Defendant. However, on February 4, 2014, the Defendant held a review personnel committee to decide to maintain the instant disposition.

Specific facts concerning the grounds for the disciplinary action of this case are as follows.

1. On July 19, 201, the defendant recruited youth internships who will work for 11 months at the defendant's head office, green technology research institute, headquarters of the metropolitan area, etc. on July 19, 201, and at least 20% of the excellent internships are scheduled to be appointed as regular employees, and academic achievement limitation is