However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2015. 5. 9. 22:50경 경북 예천군 B에 있는 C지구대 앞에서, 술에 취한 피고인을 귀가시키고자 순찰차에 태우려는 경위 D에게 “씨팔놈아, 개 새끼야, 죽여 버린다”라고 말하고, D의 멱살을 잡아 흔들며 발로 D의 우측 정강이 부위를 걷어 찼다.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (decision of sentence] [decision of sentence] The defendant has no record of punishment exceeding a fine, and there is no record of punishment exceeding a fine in depth of the defendant's mistake. In addition, the defendant's age, character and conduct, character and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered in the arguments of this case, and the sentence is imposed as ordered.