1. Fraud [2016 High Order 1301] The Defendant, at the office of the Defendant’s head of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C C Alley on May 2007, the Defendant did not intend to pay the amount despite having received the payment from the victim D, and without having intended to pay the amount to the Defendant “The Defendant supplied the imported melting materials to Seoul because there are many customers, and sold them to the customer on the face of the State, and immediately pay the amount.

“Along on May 10, 2007, it acquired 30 km for green 17,875,000 won at the market price on May 11, 2007 from the injured party and acquired 10 km for green 51,025,00 won at the market price of 10 km for green 17,875,000 won at the market price on May 11, 2007.

2. Fraud [2016 Height 2637] On May 10, 2007, the Defendant did not intend to pay the price at the home of the Victim F of the Busan Southern-gu E apartment building No. 101-806 around Busan-gu around May 10, 2007, with the delivery of melting materials from the injured party, and without the intent to pay the price to the injured party “if sending melting materials, it shall be sold and paid at the rapid time.”

“Falsely speaking, I acquired 60 km for green greenland 60 km from the injured party with a market value of KRW 21,900,000.

The defendant and his defense counsel had received melting as stated in the facts charged by the defendant from the victim D and F (the victim's marking is replaced by the victim's marking; hereinafter the victim's marking is replaced by the complainant), but all of the goods can not be sold because they cannot be sold because they are smuggling without undergoing normal customs procedures.

The argument is asserted.

On the other hand, D and G delivered the defendant a normal melting process.

was testified.

Ultimately, the judgment on the existence of the charge of the instant facts charged depends on the credibility between the Defendant’s assertion and the witness’s testimony.

As long as there exists a statement contrary to the above, it is difficult to determine the credibility of a statement solely on the basis of the statement.

If the complainants engaged in the commercial have delivered greens with customs clearance to the defendant, they shall be equipped with the customs clearance data.