2. The court below determined the above punishment against the defendant on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, and the negligence of the defendant who neglected the duty of care in front of the intersection where crosswalks are installed and caused severe consequences to the loss of the victim's life due to the crime of this case. Thus, the circumstances alleged by the prosecutor on the grounds of sentencing unfavorable to the defendant in the court of the original instance seems to have been sufficiently taken into account while determining the punishment in the original instance. In light of the fact that the defendant had expressed an attitude to reflect in depth when the crime of this case was committed properly, and that the investigative agency paid 50 million won to the victim's bereaved family members as compensation and agreed to pay 50 million won to the victim's bereaved family members as compensation and there was no criminal power against the defendant, the sentencing of the court below was too unfford and so the judgment of the court below exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

shall not be appointed by a person.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the prosecutor's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.