2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, including the fact that the Defendant’s mistake is against himself, that the Defendant completed training in response to the call for the mobilization of the reserve forces since this case, and that the Defendant’s age, gender, environment, and the circumstance that the Defendant did not comply with the call for the mobilization of the military forces of this case, the lower court’s punishment is too uneasible and unreasonable.

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. The appeal of this case by the public prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the appeal of this case is without merit.