However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. In light of around August 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received 112 reports from the victim G and the victim H, a police officer affiliated with the police box of the police box of the Yongsan-dong Police Station F of the Yongsan-gu Police Station, which called the site and sent to the site, that the person under the influence of alcohol in front of the E convenience store located in 06:12 on August 22, 2017, the Defendant: (b) received the report from the Defendant that the person under the influence of alcohol scambling in front of the convenience store located in Man-si; and (c) received the report from the victim G and the victim H, who passed through the site; and (d) attempted to drink the police; and (c) attempted to drink the said victims to enter a nearby E convenience store; (d) whether the said victims would drink the alcohol; and (e) whether the horses and the other customers reported at that place “I wish to drink it;

This Chewing Chewing theory was expressed as the "Chewing Chewing".

Accordingly, the defendant insultd the victims openly.

2. On August 22, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) committed assaulting the face of the H one time with the Defendant’s arms, i.e., the police box belonging to the police box belonging to the G and the police box belonging to the police box belonging to the Dong-dong Police Station of Yong-dong, G, and the Gyeong-dong Police Station of Yong-do, as set forth in paragraph (1) within the J convenience point, to drink the drinking of the said G, with the left hand of the horse; (b) blue the Defendant’s blue part of G with the Defendant’s arms.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases and patrol of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. A complaint filed for the preparation of G and H;

1. On August 21, 2017, in full view of each of the evidence in the judgment, the Defendant saw that the police officer did not assault a police officer only when he/she returned to the Republic of Korea on the wind that the police officer at the time when he/she proposed that he/she obstructed the performance of his/her official duties. However, in full view of each of the evidence in the judgment, the Defendant saw that he/she drinking alcohol in the vicinity of KRV, where he/she had a female in the population D around 22:40 of 20 on August 21, 2017.