beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.04.05 2017가합23473

부당이득금

Text

1. The Defendant’s title “project cost” refers to the amount corresponding to each Plaintiff as stated in the attached Table to the Plaintiffs, and each of them on May 2017.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

The defendant is a housing reconstruction project association established with the approval of establishment from the head of Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City on August 2008 in order to remove existing buildings and reconstruct multi-family housing with the business zone of Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

The Plaintiffs were owners of land and buildings below the project zone around that time.

The Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiffs, etc. on the basis of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, 122 square meters, 1/2 shares of 1/2 of 126 square meters in JJ 126 square meters in 3, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, 126 square meters in 1/2 shares of 1/2 shares in J 126 square meters in JJ 126 square meters in J 126, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

(Court) In the instant case, around April 2016, a decision of recommending reconciliation between the Defendant and the Plaintiffs was rendered and confirmed around that time. (Around 2015, 2015, 2015, 2015, 2015, 2015, 138763, etc.)

Decisions

1. The plaintiff (the defendant in this case, referring to the plaintiffs in this case, hereinafter the same shall apply) and the defendant (the plaintiff in this case, hereinafter the same shall apply) have an appraisal company designated by the defendant prior to the relocation of the building, etc. owned within the business area to conduct an appraisal of the market price, determine the amount of the appraisal based on the settlement amount, and agree that the plaintiff and the defendant bear one-half each of the appraisal expenses.

2. The Defendant ordered the Plaintiff to order the pertinent building by May 10, 2016.

3. The plaintiff can get a loan to move expenses under the same conditions as other union members before the defendant ordering the above building.

4. The Plaintiff implements the procedures for the sales contract during 2016, and where the Defendant did not conclude the sales contract within the period of conclusion of the sales contract, the Plaintiff is 15 days from the date following the date of conclusion of the sales contract.