beta
(영문) 대구고등법원 2015.04.17 2014누6389

견책처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the trial while filing an appeal by the court of first instance are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's assertion even if all of the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the statements in Gap evidence (including the serial number) submitted in the court of first instance were examined, the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff'

Therefore, the court's explanation on this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or deletion of some contents as follows. Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The third and the sixth first half of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be considered as a "defensive window" and they shall be considered as "defensive window."

Article 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance provides that “The order for separation of civil petition units, the interior equipment of the main office, and the outdoor equipment” of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be construed as “The National Police Agency’s order for separation of civil petition units, the indoor equipment of the main office, and the outdoor equipment” as follows: (a) the employees of each government agency whose amount of national loss is similar to the Plaintiff or higher than the Plaintiff due to the result of on-site inspection and audit of the facilities of the national office conducted by the National Police Agency around January 2, 2013; and (b) the amount of national

The 8th fifth sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance is the "electric challenge pumps" and the 4010187 "40187" that reduces the number of days to "40101787", respectively.

The term “procedures, etc.” in the Fifth Sentence 13th fifth sentence of the judgment of the first instance court, “The procedure” in the Fifth sentence, and “The Table 2.8.3.2.1 [Attachment 2.32] in the Fifth sentence,” respectively, shall be read as “The Standard Specifications of concrete” and “The Table 2.3.2.3.2(1) [Attachment 2.32] in the Fifth sentence, the term “one time/day” in the Fifth sentence shall be read as “the one time/day for the inspection.”

Article 94(3) of the first instance court's judgment "Recogncy test" in the second sentence of the second sentence shall be construed as "Recogncy test of ready-mixed", the third part as "quality control manager", and the fifth part as "non-quality control manager".