2. The judgment of the court below is contrary to the defendant, and the amount of damage is minor, but the defendant, including the punishment, can be found to have been identical to that of the defendant, and the crime of this case is committed without being aware of the period of repeated crime, although this previous section was used, and is not agreed with the victim. The court below appears to have determined the punishment by fully taking into account the above circumstances. Considering the various circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the sentence of the court below, the punishment of the court below cannot be deemed to have been unfairly heavy.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.