If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The Defendant is a person operating the “Cmat” in Jeju-si, and despite the fact that no person indicates the date of manufacture or the expiration date of distribution of food, etc., he/she does not engage in Article 8(1)4 of the Enforcement Rule of the Food Sanitation Act, which is different from the fact, but sells domestic style 15 km (one name net fish, Black Sea, and White Sea) supplied from D on October 16, 2012, and displays the date of manufacture (the date of processing) in 2 km remaining on March 5, 2013 [the date of processing (Packing)] different from the fact, and displayed it for the purpose of selling it to the fishery products sold in the “Cmat”, by April 29, 2013. < Amended by Act No. 11871, Mar. 5, 2013>

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the statutes on seizure records, list of seizure, documentary evidence and photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment for a crime: Article 97 subparagraph 1 of the Food Sanitation Act and Article 13 (1) 2 of the same Act; Selection of a fine;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order: The punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the following circumstances, in light of the application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act. favorable circumstances: The fact that the facts of crime are recognized and reflected, the quantity of the falsely labeled foods is low, the profits earned from the crime seems not to exist, and other reasons such as the fact that there is no previous conviction in the same kind of crime: It shall be decided as per the disposition for more reasons such