본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.09.24 2015가단2079

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 60,00,000 and the interest rate of KRW 20% per annum from December 15, 2014 to the date of full payment.


1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as to the cause of the claim Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and Eul evidence Nos. 1, the Plaintiff agreed to obtain business rights to the establishment store for the first floor of the building in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant establishment store”) around April 25, 2010 and entered into a real estate lease agreement with Eul, a lessee of the building in the instant establishment, with the deposit deposit amount of KRW 50 million on April 25, 2010, and three million monthly rent of KRW 3 million on June 8, 201, each of the above payment dates of the instant establishment and lease deposit of KRW 50 million, KRW 1,483, and KRW 100,000,000, KRW 31,000,000, KRW 181,000, KRW 3181,000,000,000.

According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the total sum of KRW 60 million and to pay damages for delay at the rate of 20% per annum from December 15, 2014 to the day following the delivery of the original copy of the payment order of this case to the day of full payment.

2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. The defendant alleged that the defendant was unaware of the defendant that he would immediately return the bill of this case to the defendant and would not claim the amount of the bill of this case, and that the defendant would not have any obligation to pay the amount of the bill of this case to the plaintiff since he had issued the bill of this case without choice due to the plaintiff's coercion. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the plaintiff's deception or coercion. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit

B. The defendant raises an objection.