The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case [Dissenting Facts] The Defendant was admitted to a high school as a person with a special expertise in scambling by fostering scams from the third grade of a middle school and was enrolled in the third grade of a high school.

On April 19, 2014, around 15:30 on 15:30 on 19 April 19, 2014, in D party room D party room, E used F to talk with her former female f's f's f's f's f's major f's G (n, 28 years of age) in the process of the f's f's f's f's f's

[2] On April 23, 2014, around 22:00, the Defendant and E used a large number of ridges, arms, and trokes of the victim H (26 tax) for drinking on the front of the Seodo-ro 38, which are located in Singue City. The Defendant and E used a large number of ridges, arms, and trokes of the above H’s bridge, arms, and trokes.

The defendant was drinking at the above date, at the above time and place, to see the part and arms of the victim G (at the age of 28), to walk as a sweak, to walk the part and arms, to see the part and arms of the victim I (at the age of 26), to blue the part and arms of the victim I (at the age of 26), and to blue the part and head of the above I with the wall.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victims jointly with E.

2. Determination

A. At the time of the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel, the Defendant only prevented the victim H from committing any more assault by getting the said victim’s grandchildren and having the left hand, and preventing the victim from committing any further assault by getting the victim’s hands, as stated in the facts charged in the instant case.

B. Among the evidence submitted by the judgment prosecutor, there are only one copy of the I’s written statement, H, and G’s written statement of the police interrogation protocol for H, and the second police interrogation protocol for E, which corresponds to the facts in the instant case, and the record of G, I’s respective statements, H, G, and I’s other records of the interrogation protocol for the police investigation for E, and other evidence submitted by the prosecutor is related to the facts and circumstances at the time or is not clearly revealed (in particular, the police officer with regard to F).