logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.07.14 2016노384
전자금융거래법위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court appears to have determined the sentence in consideration of all the following circumstances, and there is no change in circumstances in the first instance.

In addition, in consideration of various sentencing conditions shown in the records and pleadings, such as the background and means of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, the defendant's career, sexual conduct, environment, etc., the lower court's punishment is deemed appropriate and is not unfair to the extent that the lower judgment should be reversed.

In 2010, the Defendant committed the instant crime, even though he had been punished by a fine due to the transfer of electronic financial transaction access media, again, committed the same kind of crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow