logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.08.10 2015고단4102
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On February 14, 201, the Defendant came to know by the introduction of a person in a restaurant near the world at Ansan-si, Annyang-si, the Defendant will make an investment of KRW 100 million as a person with no interest of 10 years for the victim G who has passed a refund trial.

Personal information is changed. The victim’s false statement is made to the victim as if he/she invested KRW 100 million in the name of the victim in the future by stating that there is a change in the number of revenues. The latter is that there is a re-payment if he/she invests shares jointly with B/L with B.

section 3.

Since each of them has different uniforms, an earning rate can be higher.

Even if 20,000 won is lent, it may be paid one to three times the money in return for the loan.

“Falsely false.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have invested KRW 100 million in the name of the victim for the victim, and he did not receive money from the victim and did not use it for investment for the victim.

As such, the Defendant was issued a KRW 10 million around February 15, 201 from the victim by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim.

2. On March 7, 2011, the Defendant, at a restaurant near the Ganyang-si Station, was subject to retailing KRW 270,000,000 on a check from the Gando Securities to the said victim.

In order to find the theft check, deposit must be placed in the court.

different lending of deposit money. If the compensation for land is paid, it will be repaid.

“Falsely false.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have stolen the check equivalent to KRW 270 million and did not think that he would receive money from the injured party and did not have any land to be compensated.

As such, the Defendant was given the Defendant a delivery of KRW 50 million on March 8, 201, and KRW 40 million on March 14, 2011, from the victim, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim.

3. On March 30, 201, the Defendant appointed an attorney-at-law with respect to a stolen check at a restaurant near the Ganyang-si Station.

arrow