logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 헌재 2008. 11. 27. 선고 2007헌마730 결정문 [불기소처분취소]
[결정문] [전원재판부]
Cases

2007Hun-Ma730 Revocation of a non-prosecution disposition

Claimant

○○ Kim Kim

Attorney Gangnam-nam General Law Firm

Attorney Kim Dong-chul

appellees

Prosecutor of Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office

Text

The appellant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The claimant asserts that the respondent's disposition of non-prosecution in Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office No. 80868 in December 27, 2006 violated the right to equality and the right to state the procedure of trial guaranteed by the Constitution.

However, even upon examining the record, the respondent does not seem to have committed a serious fault that affected the decision of the non-prosecution disposition in interpreting the Constitution, applying the law, or determining evidence, while making an investigation into the appellant’s accusation against the justice and equity, or at the same time making a decision of the non-prosecution disposition, the respondent’s decision to

Since there is no material to regard it as a arbitrary disposition of the Do, this cannot be viewed as a violation of the basic rights of the claimant's assertion.

Therefore, the appellant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

November 27, 2008

Judges

Chief Justice Lee Han-hoon

Judges Lee Dong-chul

Justices Cho Jong-dae

Justices Kim Jong-ok

Justices Kim Jong-dae

Justices Park Jong-chul

Movement of Justices

Justices Jo Young-young

Justices Song Du-hwan

arrow