logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.07.03 2019나23666
중개수수료 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance do not differ significantly from the allegations in the judgment of the court of first instance, and even if considering the respective descriptions of evidence Nos. 28 through 32 submitted by the plaintiff in the appellate court, it is insufficient to recognize that the plaintiff still mediated the contract of this case between the defendant and F, so the fact-finding and the judgment of the court of first instance

Therefore, the reasoning of this court concerning this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow