logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.06.27 2019가단100328
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The Plaintiff, among the real estate listed in the Appendix 1 List:

A. Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D shall each share of 1/24.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff’s possession 1) I, on March 10, 1937, real estate listed in attached Table 1 (hereinafter “instant land”).

(B) After registration of preservation of ownership was made on the instant land, the real estate listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table on the instant land (hereinafter “instant building”).

2) On May 5, 192, 192, the KJ newly built a new family to live together with its family members, and then died on the land and buildings of this case to the third surviving family members. 2) On May 5, 1992, the KJ supported the deceased I and supported the deceased I until the deceased I died.

3) On December 9, 2005, J, a large child, had lived with the Plaintiff, and died on December 9, 2005. (B) On May 5, 1992, the deceased on May 5, 1992, J inherited the instant land and buildings, which are the children of the deceased I, K (mama, G (MM, 17 September 17, 1946), M (M, 3 women, 99, death on December 9, 2005), WN (Death, 4 women, 196 May 21, 199), and 1/6 shares in each of the instant land and buildings.

(B) As the deceased on December 9, 2005, the Plaintiff, a child of the deceasedJ, succeeded to one-half of the shares of J. 3) as the deceased on May 21, 1996, the Plaintiff inherited one-half of the shares of N. 1-six of the shares of N. 24 by Defendant B (C), the deceased on May 21, 1996, Defendant C, Defendant C (C), and Defendant D (C) inherited one-half of the shares of N. 216, following the death of N. Q.

C. On February 17, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the deceased’s heir, without omitting Defendant E, F, G, and H, and received the judgment in favor of the Plaintiff or the recommendation for reconciliation, as in the instant case, on May 5, 2012.

However, the share of inheritance against the Defendants was omitted or inconsistent, and thus, did not execute the said shares.

[Grounds for recognition] Evidence A Nos. 1 through 7 shall be the number.

arrow