logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.04.26 2017고단2416
건설산업기본법위반등
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by a fine of 2,000,000 won, and Defendant D shall be punished by a fine of 1,500,000 won, respectively.

Defendant

A. A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative of Defendant B Co., Ltd. in F at all times, and Defendant B is a corporation with the objective of maintaining and repairing factory equipment pipes, etc., and Defendant D is a person with a national technical qualification witness pipe G qualification certificate.

1. No person who violates the national technical qualification Act shall lend or lend his/her national technical qualification certificate to any third person;

A. Defendant AD is only registered as an employee in Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”) and substantial employment relationship was terminated since October 1, 2016.

On February 6, 2017, the Defendant received a certificate of qualification for the aforementioned national technical qualification from D in mind that he/she had registered a mechanical facility construction business in the name of the said company at the office B, Inc.

Accordingly, the defendant borrowed another person's national technical qualification certificate.

B. While the employment relationship with the Defendant Company B was annulled, the Defendant leased the above national technical qualification certificate owned by the Defendant to A with the knowledge of the date, time, place, and purpose A’s aforementioned purpose.

Accordingly, the defendant lent national technical qualification certificate.

(c)

Defendant

B The Defendant, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph 1-A, committed the act of violation as described in paragraph 1-A in relation to the Defendant’s work.

2. Violation of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry;

(a) Any person who intends to run a construction business shall register the construction business with the competent authorities;

On March 23, 2017, the Defendant registered the mechanical facility construction business (H) in the name of the said company using the above qualification certificate borrowed from D in the absence of a real employment relationship with D, as described in paragraph 1-A., only when D is an employee of the said company, as indicated in paragraph 1-A. However, the Defendant had no actual employment relationship with D.

Accordingly, the defendant registered a construction business by illegal means.

B. Defendant B Co., Ltd. is the date and time stated in paragraph 2-A.

arrow