logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.08.21 2020고합35
특수상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:00 on June 26, 2019, the Defendant stated that, in D operated by the Defendant’s mother, C was an instructor at the Art Research Institute of Art in the same building, and that, while his mother became an issue of the use of common toilets, Cratium was made to her mother on the ground that her mother was influence, the Defendant expressed her mother on the ground that her mother was influence, and that her mother was influenced, her mother was influenced, her mother, her head, her inner part, her inner part, and her mobile phone, which is a dangerous object, the Defendant expressed her the victim’s head, her inner part, her inner part, and her mobile phone, which is a dangerous object, the Defendant expressed the victim’s her son, her mother, her mother, and her mother

As a result, the Defendant carried dangerous articles with the victim about two weeks of medical treatment, thereby going through two open situations where medical treatment is needed, and insulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E in part of the defendant;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each written complaint of each injury photograph, field photograph, recording book, each injury diagnosis report, photograph, tape recording file file, each internal investigation report (Evidence No. 15, 16, 18, 21, 22) and each investigation report (Evidence No. 34, 39) shall apply;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1) and 311 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act [the aggregate of the long-term punishments of the above two crimes]

1. With respect to the point of special injury or injury on the part of the defendant and his/her defense counsel’s assertion on the grounds of sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (hereinafter the following sentencing grounds), the defendant did not look at the victim by cell phone.

2. In full view of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, the judgment shall be based on the evidence duly adopted and examined:

arrow