logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 03. 24. 선고 2015두60006 판결
(심리불속행) 조세회피의 목적이 있었는지 여부는 명의신탁 할 당시를 기준으로 판단함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2015-Nu-46170 ( December 04, 2015)

Title

(C) Whether there was a purpose of tax avoidance or not shall be determined at the time of title trust.

Summary

(Summary) Although no distribution was made after a stock title trust, it is difficult to deem that there was no tax avoidance purpose by reducing global income tax burden on dividend income, reducing the liability limit for secondary tax liability, etc., in that the earned surplus of the company was accumulated as approximately KRW 1.8 billion at the time when the title trust was held.

Related statutes

Legal fiction of donation of title trust property under Article 45-2 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

Cases

2015du6006 Disposition of revocation of imposition of gift tax, etc.

Plaintiff-Appellant

O KimO

Defendant-Appellee

OO Head of the tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2015Nu46170 Decided December 4, 2015

Imposition of Judgment

2016.03.24

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Examining the lower judgment and the grounds of appeal, the grounds of appeal by appellant are not included in the grounds of appeal under each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Procedure for Appeal, or are deemed to fall under each subparagraph of paragraph (3). Therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow