A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a D to manufacture rolls, blods, etc. in Si interesting C.

On October 11, 2010, the Defendant: (a) at the F cafeteria parking lot located in Singu, Singu; (b) on October 11, 2010, at the F cafeteria, the Victim G paid KRW 80 million to the Victim G; (c) if the Defendant loans KRW 20 million with the factory operation fund, he shall pay the principal and interest in five installments; and (d) he/she shall pay the principal and interest in five months after the month. If the factory is returned, he/she shall pay without calculating the amount of interest of KRW 20 million,000,000,000 in a month. He/she received a check of KRW 20,000 from that place.

In addition, around February 17, 2011, the Defendant issued a deposit sheet equivalent to KRW 10 million on the job to the victim in front of the agricultural cooperative located in Chungcheongnam-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, stating that “if operating funds are required to be added, interest shall be given to a loan of KRW 10 million, and the principal shall be repaid six months after the principal is paid.”

However, in fact, the Defendant had no intention or ability to repay the debt even if she borrowed money from the victim because the Defendant had to pay 40 million won at the time and to offer it as security to the victim had already been seized by other creditors.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received a total sum of KRW 30 million from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Part concerning G statement of the police suspect examination protocol against the defendant

1. Protocol of each police statement concerning G;

1. A copy of a notarial deed or a copy of a loan;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (report on attachment of corporeal movables);

1. The fact that the relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act for sentencing for the crime of this case are not good in light of the methods and contents of the crime of this case, the fact that the crime is not suitable, the fact that the amount of fraud is not stated, but the victim has not made efforts to repay for about four years from the date of borrowing, and the victim is the victim.