(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2017.01.18 2016고단1135

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2017.01.18 2016고단1135

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 21, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud in the Changwon District Court’s territorial branch on August 21, 2013, and completed the enforcement of the said sentence on December 13, 2013.

When the Defendant lost money while making a single-name card gambling, the Defendant and the proprietor of the gambling equipment, who installed the gambling equipment with which the name he was known through the Defendant’s friendship C and the Internet could not be known, installed a camera in the office ceiling located in the Tong-si and the third floor of the above camera, and then informed the Defendant and C of the card processed by the special drugs, and the Defendant and C conspired to share the role of gambling with the card processed by the special drugs while receiving contact from the said installer via the ultra-sized earphone.

1. On July 17, 2016, the Defendant, in collusion with C and the said installation business entity, obtained the money in the above office from around 23:00 to the next 05:00 on the following day, and the Defendant, even if he did so by means of the above methods, as if he did gambling against the victim E, F, G, and H, a single-name “bruth” where the loss is determined by chance, and thereby, acquired the money in an amount of KRW 5 million in total from the victims by means of gambling.

2. The Defendant attempted to commit fraud in collusion with C and the said installer from July 19, 2016 to 05:00 on the following day, and the Defendant, even if he did so by the aforementioned methods, was aware that he did gambling with the victim E, F, G, and H, and even if he did so, he attempted to receive the total amount of KRW 7.7 million from the victim’s gambling by means of gambling from the victims. However, the Defendant did not commit fraud and attempted to receive the victim’s gambling from the victims, and did not commit such fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1.With respect to G prepared by a prosecutor.

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 마산지원 2017.01.25 2016고단1306

-창원지방법원 통영지원 2017.08.10 2017고단765

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2018.09.13 2018고단455

-광주지방법원 2017.03.10 2017고합6

-창원지방법원 통영지원 2017.08.31 2017고단613