A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On March 24, 2015, the Defendant entered into a contract for the construction of three factories and one office in Korea-si D on March 24, 2015 as an actual manager of C Co., Ltd. and the construction of new construction of three factories and one office. However, the Defendant could not receive part of the construction cost due to defects.

Therefore, the Defendant applied for a payment order with the address of the above construction site as the service place of the transfer development company, with the knowledge that the person related to the transfer development company did not work at any time at the above construction site, applied for a payment order with the address of the above construction site as the service place of the transfer development company, received the original copy of the two payment orders as employees of the transfer development company, and confirmed the payment order by preventing the transfer development company from raising an objection within two weeks, and applied for compulsory execution of the above new construction building, and applied for compulsory execution against the above new construction building, and applied for a payment order with the amount of KRW 40 million as the creditor C corporation, the debtor corporation, and the debtor corporation as the transfer development court around March 2016.

1. Around March 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) sought confirmation as to whether he/she was a member of the House E, who was found in the above construction site D located in Hasan-si without authority for the purpose of exercising; (b) obtained, without authority, whether he/she was an employee of the House E, who was found in the service place of the application for the payment order; (c) notified the name as if he/she was an employee of the House Development; and (d) made the signature “F” in the signature column of the notice of postal service on the original copy of the payment order; and (d) forged the signature of F’s name and exercised it to E on that spot.

2. The Defendant attempted to commit fraud, such as Paragraph 1, around March 21, 2016, served the original copy of the payment order for the construction cost case of Jeonju District Court Kim Jong-si, 2016j122, which was against the victim’s transfer development company, as if he were the victim’s employee.