The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

In full view of the summary of the grounds for appeal (not guilty part of the judgment of the court below) victims and witnesses' statements, etc., the court below erred by misapprehending the facts in the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendants about the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (not guilty part of the judgment of the court below) by judging that such behavior of the defendants does not constitute "domination", since the defendant immediately stops after the occurrence of the accident, did not take necessary measures, such as checking the victim's

Judgment

A. On March 13, 2014, the summary of the facts charged (the point of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) runs two-lanes along the four-lane road adjacent to the intersection of the Gwanyangyang-si, Seoyangyang-si, in terms of lightyangyang-si, into the chilling hospital: (a) the Defendant, at the time, was negligent in performing the duty of due care to accurately operate the steering and operating the steering wheel and brake system in a safe manner while neglecting the duty of care; (b) on the part of the victim E, the rear part of the victim E who stopped the signal signal at the same lane, and caused the victims to have his 3-dimensional driver off the 8-lane vehicle and then to exchange the 8-wheeled vehicle with the victim's vehicle at the same time, and then caused the victim's damage to the 3-wide.

(b) related;