beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 16,197,606, Plaintiff C, D, and E respectively, and each of them from May 21, 2016.
Reasons
1. The following facts are acknowledged as either a dispute between the parties or in full view of Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 18, the results of the request for appraisal of medical records to the G Association of this Court, and the purport of the entire arguments.
A. From March 10, 2013, the deceased A (hereinafter “the deceased”) was hospitalized in the Jvalescent Hospital located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which was operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) and received medical treatment, such as blood urology, etc.
B. On May 21, 2016, the Deceased, under the diagnosis of “the safe heart suspension, and other unclassified cerebral brain damage” at K Hospital and L Hospital, died on April 23, 2017, where the Deceased received treatment together with chronic dystyphism, etc., under the diagnosis of “the instant accident” by removing the dyscopic shocks caused by excessive dyscopic shocks caused by blood injection (hereinafter “the instant accident”).
C. The plaintiff B is the deceased's wife, and the remaining plaintiffs are the deceased's children.
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. In full view of the evidence Nos. 1 through 18, the results of the request for the appraisal of medical records to the G Association of this Court, and the purport of the entire pleadings, it is reasonable to deem that the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital committed the following negligence in relation to the instant accident. Therefore, the Defendant is liable to compensate the deceased and the plaintiffs for damages caused by the instant
1) The Deceased was diagnosed by dementia around October 2013, and around 2016, the dementia had already been seriously ill (in the fourth stage of the CDA), and on May 14, 2016, there was a lack of blood speculation treatment on the wind to remove the cryptory ptom ptos for blood speculation on the part of the Plaintiff’s hospital.
Thus, the medical personnel of the defendant hospital is the deceased through the appropriate use of the physical suppression unit in blood speculation treatment at the time of the accident of this case.