logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.05.23 2018고단1030
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C-A-hurd motor vehicle.

On September 3, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 20:00 and proceeded to turn to the left from the Myeon of the apartment village located in the forest at the time of the Sihung to the Myeon-ro.

The vehicle signal in the direction of the intersection was red, and the crosswalk signal in all directions in the intersection was green signal. In such a case, as pedestrians are crossing the road on the crosswalk, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by stopping the vehicle on the front stop line in the intersection and starting the vehicle in accordance with the new direction of the passage.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went to turn to the left by entering the intersection in violation of the duty of pedestrian protection in the new and crosswalk, and caused the victim E and the victim F who walked on the left side from the right side of the road to the front part of the Defendant’s car according to the pedestrian signals of the crosswalk, and caused the victims E to go to the road, resulting in an injury of focused brain injury, etc. with a focus on the victim E, who is in need of approximately 6 weeks of treatment for about 24 weeks of treatment, and resulting in other injury, such as water and other damages, etc. which require approximately 24 weeks of treatment to the victim F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Accident scene and vehicle photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Penalty) concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter “the Act”) of the Act on the Attractiond in the Nowon-gu Station, the Defendant was a juvenile, and there was no criminal record, and the instant vehicle was covered by a comprehensive insurance, and all victims agreed to do so, but the Defendant was at the time of the instant accident.

arrow